Staff Scientist Meleah Boyle, PhD MPH, co-senior author of the study, said addressing period poverty, as the issue has been called, is a growing area of research in the United States

“Our study highlights the widespread nature of period poverty and the need for broad actions – both locally and nationally – to increase the affordability and accessibility of these products for youth,” Boyle said.

Menstrual equity means that every person who menstruates should have equal access to affordable and quality menstrual products. Unfortunately, many people do not have access to these necessary products. In the study, researchers found that 30% of adolescents do not have the products they need with no differences based on measures of socioeconomic status, such as insurance and community opportunity, or individual differences, such as race and ethnicity.

Prior research estimates that of those who menstruate, 11.9 million struggle to find access to menstrual products. This lack of access can lead to absences from school and/or work as well as negative health outcomes such as urinary tract infections and bacterial vaginosis.

Boyle said the research highlights the need for public health programs and policy changes to ensure youth have access to the products they need to avoid negative impacts on their health and engagement.

“Ensuring access to healthy and appropriate menstrual health products should be a public health priority,” Boyle said.

Study co-author Riya Metha is scheduled to present the research from 5:15-6:15 pm ET Saturday, Sept. 28

In addition, Monika Goyal, MD, MSCE, co-senior author, will be among highlighted abstract authors who will give brief presentations and be available for interviews during a press conference from noon-1:30 pm ET Saturday, Sept. 28 in the National Conference Press Room, W208 AB. During the meeting, you may reach AAP media relations staff at 407-685-5401.

Please note: only the abstract is being presented at the meeting. In some cases, the researcher may have more data available to share with media, or may be preparing a longer article for submission to a journal.

ABSTRACT

Program Name: 2024 AAP National Conference-Abstracts

Submission Type: Council on Adolescents and Young Adults

Abstract Title: Prevalence of Period Poverty in a Pediatric Emergency Department

# of Newsworthy Nominations: 2

Gia Badolato

Washington DC, DC, United States

The abstract, “Overprescription of Opioids in White Children from Higher Socioeconomic Backgrounds: Disparities in Opioid Utilization for Pediatric Supracondylar Humerus Fractures,” looked at the rates in opioid prescriptions following childhood broken elbow diagnoses from 2012 to 2021.

Apurva Shah, MD, MBA, Attending Surgeon, Orthopaedic Surgery at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, who authored the abstract, also pointed to results that showed a third of patients in the abstract received at least one opioid dose during their visit.

“As orthopaedic surgeons, we clearly need improved opioid use stewardship to improve healthcare outcomes for our patients,” Dr. Shah said.

Results found disparities in patient racial backgrounds, with Black children 27% less likely to receive an opioid prescription compared to other patients. By comparison, white patients were also shown to be 10% more likely to be given opioids.

Other factors that impacted patients’ likelihood of being given opioids included age and where they live, according to Dr. Shah.

“Non-opioid pain management has proven sufficient for pain management,” Dr. Shah said. “Knowing this, along with this abstract, pediatricians must consider the potential harm these drugs can have on populations with disproportionately easier access to healthcare.”

This research was funded by Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Division of Orthopaedics.

Scott Mahon is scheduled to present the research, which is below, at 8:51 – 8:55  a.m. on Sunday, Sept. 29 during the Section on Orthopaedics program at Orange County Convention Center, West Building, W311H. To request an interview with the authors, contact Ashley Moore at moorea1@chop.edu.

The American Academy of Pediatrics is an organization of 67,000 primary care pediatricians, pediatric medical subspecialists and pediatric surgical specialists dedicated to the health, safety and well-being of infants, children, adolescents and young adults. For more information, visit www.aap.org. Reporters can access the meeting program and other relevant meeting information through the AAP meeting website at http://www.aapexperience.org/ 

ABSTRACT

Program Name: 2024 AAP National Conference-Abstracts

Submission Type: Section on Orthopaedics

Abstract Title: Overprescription of Opioids in White Children from Higher Socioeconomic Backgrounds: Disparities in Opioid Utilization for Pediatric Supracondylar Humerus Fractures

Apurva Shah

Philadelphia, PA, United States

Their study recently published in the journal JAMA Health Forum shows that policies requiring coverage of a 12-month supply of short-acting hormonal contraception — most commonly the birth control pill — have not been fully implemented, resulting in no substantial increases nationally in year-long prescription orders. This leaves many patients at an increased risk for unintended pregnancy.

A common cause for decreased effectiveness with the pill is breaks in use, often due to running out of a prescription or a lapse in obtaining a refill. However, dispensing a longer-term supply of contraception — six or 12 months — is linked to improved continuous use, fewer breaks in coverage and health system savings.

“The decision of when or if to become pregnant is deeply personal,” said Maria Rodriguez, M.D., M.P.H., professor of obstetrics and gynecology in the OHSU School of Medicine and director of the OHSU Center for Reproductive Health Equity. “It shouldn’t be impacted by a delay in getting to your pharmacy for a refill, or a pill package running out while on vacation.”

To address this barrier, policymakers in 19 states have enacted 12-month contraceptive supply policies, which require insurers to cover the cost of dispensing a full year of coverage at once per prescription. However, OHSU researchers found that these policies have not been fully implemented and have failed to change current prescribing practices.

Using a difference-in-difference model, which compares changes in outcomes over time between populations, researchers looked at oral pill, patch and ring contraception prescriptions among nearly 4.8 million female Medicaid enrollees ages 18 to 44 in 36 states — 11 states with the 12-month supply policy, and 25 without. Researchers found that in 10 of the 11 states with the policy, an increase in the proportion of contraception dispensed was smaller than one percentage point — meaning just a nominal improvement in year-long prescription orders.

“Our findings suggest a significant gap in knowledge both for patients and prescribers, and we hope this serves as a call to action to make 12-month supplies the standard prescribing practice,” Rodriguez said. “This is low-hanging fruit for improving birth control access, especially for people who live in states with more restrictions on reproductive health care.”

For coverage policies to be effective, insurance companies must comply with and be held accountable for following the revised coverage guidelines, Rodriguez said. Similarly, clinicians would need to change their standard prescribing patterns to write for an extended supply of contraception, and pharmacists would need to dispense the full supply.

The research team says full implementation of these policies will require outreach to contraceptive users, prescribers, pharmacists and payers, as well as enforcement from state governments. A federal policy mandating coverage of a 12-month supply is another strategy to support access, as it would require all insurers, including private payers, to cover 12-month contraception supplies.

Rodriguez encourages patients to feel empowered to ask about their contraceptive options and advocate for choices that are the best fit their personal preferences, lifestyle and family planning goals.

“In our current health care landscape, where reproductive rights are constantly under attack, it’s critical to remove barriers and ensure broad access to contraception,” Rodriguez said. “We need providers to be following this prescribing practice as their default and patients to know that it’s their right to ask for it.”

The study targeted patients with blood pressure higher than 140/90 mmHg who were receiving care in clinics specializing in kidney conditions. The ConnectedCare365 Hypertension Management program provided people in central and northeast Pennsylvania communities with remote blood-pressure monitoring and other devices that transmit information to doctors. Patients were identified and enrolled through a centralized monitoring center, known as ConnectedCare365, to ensure consistent messaging and ample education on the devices and patient communication application. Doctors and pharmacists assigned by the program co-managed patient care and helped adjust medications for patients.

“In our study, we developed a program that builds off what others have done using telemonitoring and pharmacists,” said senior study author Alexander Chang, M.D., M.S., a nephrologist and associate professor in the department of nephrology and the department of population health sciences at Geisinger Health in Danville, Pennsylvania. “By deploying these extra resources to get blood pressure under control in high-risk patients and reducing hospitalizations, we are hoping that we can help provide more justification in expanding these types of programs.”

Notifications from the home blood pressure-monitoring devices were transmitted to the central monitoring center. During the first six months of the program, the notifications were first transmitted to doctors in collaboration with pharmacists through a virtual platform that connected to patients’ phones through an app, which connected to the devices over Bluetooth. Blood pressure measurements were assessed and blood pressure medications were prescribed and/or adjusted accordingly. During the second six months, the notifications were transmitted first to pharmacists, who co-managed blood pressure through a collaborative telehealth practice agreement. While patients were enrolled in the program, they also had real-time access to a nurse during business hours through a live chat feature in the central monitoring center.

Study results include:

• 67% of patients were able to achieve blood pressure control of <140/90 mm Hg at six months, and 74% of patients were able to achieve blood pressure control by 12 months. The 2017 clinical guideline from the American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology set the threshold for stage 1 hypertension at 130/80 mm Hg and the threshold for stage 2 hypertension at 140/90 mm Hg.
• Systolic blood pressure was lowered by an average of 3.3 mm Hg/month for those with initial blood pressure readings greater than 150/90 mm Hg; lowered by 2.4 mmHg/month for those with initial readings in the range of 140-149/90-99 mm Hg; and lowered by 0.6 mm Hg/month for those with initial readings lower than 140/90 mm Hg.
• Pharmacist telehealth encounters, in which the patients talked directly with pharmacists about hypertension management, were documented in 65% of patients, and pharmacist interactions were associated with a 1.3 mm Hg/month decline in systolic blood pressure over time.
• During the 12-month study period, 46% of patients had a blood pressure medication adjustment, and 37% were prescribed new blood pressure medication.
• Patients experienced fewer hospitalizations during the study period compared to the previous 12 months; however, there was no difference in the number of reported emergency department visits.

“We know that home blood pressure monitoring can be done by patients accurately and can really help engage patients in their own health. However, we also know that these self-measured blood pressure readings often do not make it back to patients’ health care team, therefore, delays in adjusting medications are very common. This type of physician-pharmacist collaborative model with home blood pressure monitoring that is centrally received and monitored by the care team can help address these issues,” Chang said.

Study background and details:

• The study included 205 adults, with an average age of 62 years; 48% self-identified as women and 52% as men.
• 87% of participants self-identified as non-Hispanic white adults, 6% as Black adults; 5% as Hispanic adults, and 1.5% as “other” for race/ethnicity.
• 53% of participants had a diagnosis of chronic kidney disease at the time of enrollment.
• Participants’ blood pressure was tracked for up to 6-12 months between March 2022 and May 2024 with consistent improvements even after participation in the study ended.

The study’s strengths included its ability to review hospitalization data, inclusion of the pharmacists, the careful examination of the pharmacists’ role in this program and that it was conducted in a real-world setting, the authors noted. The study’s limitations included that patients were their own control group to determine the impact of the program and participants had to have internet access.

“This is an important program that allows for more efficient management of a high-risk patient group,” said Wanpen Vongpatanasin, M.D., FAHA, professor in the department of internal medicine at UT Southwestern Medical Center, director of UT Southwestern Medical Center’s Hypertension Section in the division of cardiology and clinical chair of the Hypertension Scientific Sessions 2024 Executive Committee. “This program’s team-based care approach including a pharmacist remotely makes it a feasible option to increase access. In addition, the study’s findings signal a way to reduce hospitalization and to improve blood pressure, which is very encouraging.”

Note: Moderated Poster Presentation MP11 in Session MPS02 New Paradigm and Lessons learn from Hypertension Clinical Trials in 2024 is Friday, September 6, 2024 at 9:35 a.m. CT.

Why is opioid use before hip or knee replacement a problem?

Patients who require THA or TKA suffer from end stage osteoarthritis with chronic pain. Opioids often provide no better pain relief that simple analgesics and yet they carry the risk of additional side effects such as drowsiness and the risk of falls. Moreover, opioid use before surgery is linked to worse outcomes including slower recovery and persistent opioid use three months after surgery.

THA and TKA are among the most common elective surgical procedures performed around the world and numbers are expected to at least double over the next decade.

The OpioidHALT trial (Feasibility of responsible pre-operative opioid use for Hip and knee ArthropLasTy (OpioidHALT) pilot study) was designed to examine the feasibility and acceptability of an intervention to reduce opioid use before elective THA or TKA compared to usual practice.

How OpioidHALT tackles pre-operative opioid use?

There is little published evidence for the effectiveness of opioid dose tapering. One previous retrospective study showed that patients who tapered their opioids before surgery might have better post-surgical outcomes. However, as the study was not randomised it was not known if there was something different about the patients who tapered their doses.

The OpioidHALT study involved video or telephone consultations with a pharmacist starting three months before the date of the operation. The pharmacist worked with each patient to develop an opioid tapering plan that was evaluated for safety by a pain specialist. Patients determined the level of opioid tapering that they wished within the framework of national guidelines i.e. 10 to 25% of the patient’s baseline opioid dose tapered per month.

What the OpioidHALT pilot study tells us

The initial consultations in the OpioidHALT study took about one hour. Follow-up appointments started one week after each dose reduction and were typically shorter, Patients were educated about how to identify and manage opioid withdrawal symptoms. “If necessary, the patient was put back on a higher opioid dose”, says Dr Liu.

OpioidHALT was a pilot study designed to determine whether the intervention delivered by pharmacists led to successful tapering of opioid doses. The results showed that in the intervention group 90% of patients tapered their opioid doses by at least 50% before surgery compared with17% in the usual care group.

Although the pilot study was not powered to evaluate other outcomes, some of the emerging findings suggest important impacts. In the intervention group there were –

• Fewer opioids consumed in hospital
• Smaller quantities of opioids supplied on discharge
• Fewer days in hospital
• Fewer patients taking opioids three months post-operation

Patients in the intervention group also had improved physical function and improved overall body pain intensity.

Why pharmacists should manage pre-operative opioid use

As a result of the impressive results from the OpioidHALT study Dr Jonathan Penm has now received funding of $1.5 million to run the definitive trial (OpioidHALT II). Recruitment started two months ago.

Recordings of the consultations showed that many patients were keen to discontinue opioid use but needed help with the process. “We’ve got patients who are crying [out] to have pharmacists to be more involved in their care …. and that’s something that a lot of pharmacists can do”, says Dr Penm. He adds that the whole multidisciplinary research team says “This is a really good intervention, we should be doing this, pharmacists should be leading it”

About Dr Shania Liu and Dr Jonathan Penm

Dr Shania Liu  BPharm (Hons), GradCertEdStud (Higher Ed), PhD, FSHP, FHEA completed her PhD at the University of Sydney looking at a pharmacist-led opioid tapering program for patients undergoing total hip and knee arthroplasty. Currently, she is a post-doctoral research fellow working at the University of Alberta in Canada where she is leading two large randomised trials looking at pharmacist-partnered management of chronic conditions such as cardiovascular disease. She also  continues to be involved in the pharmacist-led opioid tapering work looking at the impacts of opioid tapering before hip and knee replacement surgery.

At the 2024 FIP Congress Dr Liu was awarded the International Pharmaceutical Federation Early Career in Pharmaceutical Practice Recognition Award. The purpose of the award is to recognise an outstanding early career pharmacist who has made important contributions to their field of practice at a national level, and who is emerging internationally.

Dr Jonathan Penm BPharm (Hons), GradCertEdStud (Higher Ed), PhD, FFIP, FSHP, FPS, FHEA, FANZCAP (PainMgmt, Research) is a senior lecturer at the University of Sydney School of Pharmacy in Australia. He is involved in both teaching and research and is also affiliated with the Prince of Wales Hospital, where he is involved in research with the pain team. His area of interest is evaluating hospital pharmacy services to reduce patient harm and the need for hospital care.  He currently runs several randomised controlled trials and is the Principal Investigator for OpioidHALT II.

Read and watch the full series on our website or on YouTube.

Some 575 patients were screened for inclusion in the OpioidHALT study and 442 were excluded because of low opioid use. “That is the reality of clinical trials for you”, says Dr Shania Liu. “We know that approximately a quarter of patients in [this] population don’t use opioids on a regular basis”, she adds. Nevertheless, dosage tapering is still important for the many patients who are using opioids regularly.

OpioidHALT II

As a result of the impressive results from the OpioidHALT study Dr Jonathan Penm has now received funding of $1.5 million to run the definitive trial (OpioidHALT II). Recruitment started two months ago.  “What’s great about it is all of the pilot sites were so impressed by the pilot that they’ve all stayed on for this definitive trial. Other sites have also expressed interest because they’ve been so excited about it”, says Dr Penm. “We’re going to have more pharmacists, a lot more patients – and [it] will be primarily powered to look at those pain and quality of life outcomes”, he explains.

Pharmacists often improve medication regimens but rarely find out how much of an impact the changes have on patients’ lives. One of the useful and important findings in the OpioidHALT study was that the early benefits of reduced opioid use were sustained for three months. “It just shows you the value that pharmacists can provide to their patients – that when we improve their medicines we could be improving it for much, much longer than you realise and having much, much stronger impact”, says Dr Penm.

All the opioid-tapering consultations were recorded and patients’ reactions made a profound impact on Dr Penm.

“Many of them were just so grateful to have someone listen to them,  to validate what they’ve been going through with their pain and to support them through the opioids. In fact, most of them said, “I’ve never had any benefit from these but I just don’t know how to get off them – and I really would love some help”,  so I think we’ve got patients who are crying [out] to have pharmacists to be more involved in their care, to be more present, to listen to them, to validate what they’re going through – and that’s something that a lot of pharmacists can do”, he says.

In summary Dr Penm says:

“Any work of this calibre is extremely difficult to do with one person and we have a very large team. One of the unique aspects is how multidisciplinary it was – we have pharmacists, we have nurses, we have GPs, we have anaesthetists, we have physiotherapists, we have orthopaedic surgeons – and we know how rare it is to get all these people together in one spot and for all of them to say, “This is a really good intervention, we should be doing this, pharmacists should be leading it”. It’s just beautiful to hear. You don’t always hear that the pharmacist is the most obvious choice but in this case they are. They’re happy, they’re competent, they’re capable – and everyone else doesn’t want to do this because it is not their area of expertise. Well, with pharmacy we’re very comfortable because we know this, we know opioids, we see tapering, we know how to taper, we know what to expect”.

About Dr Shania Liu and Dr Jonathan Penm

Dr Shania Liu  BPharm (Hons), GradCertEdStud (Higher Ed), PhD, FSHP, FHEA completed her PhD at the University of Sydney looking at a pharmacist-led opioid tapering program for patients undergoing total hip and knee arthroplasty. Currently, she is a post-doctoral research fellow working at the University of Alberta in Canada where she is leading two large randomised trials looking at pharmacist-partnered management of chronic conditions such as cardiovascular disease. She also  continues to be involved in the pharmacist-led opioid tapering work looking at the impacts of opioid tapering before hip and knee replacement surgery.

Dr Jonathan Penm BPharm (Hons), GradCertEdStud (Higher Ed), PhD, FFIP, FSHP, FPS, FHEA, FANZCAP (PainMgmt, Research) is a senior lecturer at the University of Sydney School of Pharmacy in Australia. He is involved in both teaching and research and is also affiliated with the Prince of Wales Hospital, where he is involved in research with the pain team. His area of interest is evaluating hospital pharmacy services to reduce patient harm and the need for hospital care.  He currently runs several randomised controlled trials and is the Principal Investigator for OpioidHALT II.

Read and watch the full series on our website or on YouTube.

The initial consultations in the OpioidHALT study – when the opioid tapering plans were developed took about one hour. Follow-up appointments started one week after each dose reduction to check on progress and safety; these were typically shorter, explains Dr Shania Liu. Opioid withdrawal symptoms were one obvious concern. Dr Liu emphasises that the tapering rate was very gradual to minimise the risks of opioid withdrawal and patients were educated about what to look out for and how to overcome withdrawal symptoms. “If necessary the patient was put back on a higher opioid dose to ….. ensure that patient safety came first”, she says.  In fact, all adverse events were recorded during the study.

OpioidHALT findings

OpioidHALT was a pilot study designed to determine whether the intervention delivered by pharmacists led to successful tapering of opioid doses, explains Dr Jonathan Penm. “We also found that currently GPs or primary care physicians are generally responsible for opioid tapering, but that’s not their happy place – they were not comfortable, they did not want to spend their time on that”, he says.  However, pharmacists were keen to undertake this work.  The results showed that in the intervention group 90% of patients tapered their opioid doses by at least 50% before surgery compared with17% in the usual care group. “As a researcher it’s very rare to see such large differences – 17% versus 90%”, says Dr Penm.

Although the pilot study was not powered to evaluate other outcomes, some of the emerging findings suggest important impacts.  Those patients whose opioid doses were tapered before surgery consumed fewer opioids in hospital and received smaller quantities of opioids at discharge.  In addition, the length of hospital stay was shorter (4 days versus 5.6 days) in the intervention group. Three months after the surgery those in the intervention group were much less likely to be taking opioids than those in the control group. They also had improved physical function and  improved overall body pain intensity. Dr Penm notes that “it’s not powered for that so we do have to be a bit cautious  – but these are very promising results”.

About Dr Shania Liu and Dr Jonathan Penm

Dr Shania Liu  BPharm (Hons), GradCertEdStud (Higher Ed), PhD, FSHP, FHEA completed her PhD at the University of Sydney looking at a pharmacist-led opioid tapering program for patients undergoing total hip and knee arthroplasty. Currently, she is a post-doctoral research fellow working at the University of Alberta in Canada where she is leading two large randomised trials looking at pharmacist-partnered management of chronic conditions such as cardiovascular disease. She also  continues to be involved in the pharmacist-led opioid tapering work looking at the impacts of opioid tapering before hip and knee replacement surgery.

At the 2024 FIP Congress Dr Liu was awarded the International Pharmaceutical Federation Early Career in Pharmaceutical Practice Recognition Award. The purpose of the award is to recognise an outstanding early career pharmacist who has made important contributions to their field of practice at a national level, and who is emerging internationally.

Dr Jonathan Penm BPharm (Hons), GradCertEdStud (Higher Ed), PhD, FFIP, FSHP, FPS, FHEA, FANZCAP (PainMgmt, Research) is a senior lecturer at the University of Sydney School of Pharmacy in Australia. He is involved in both teaching and research and is also affiliated with the Prince of Wales Hospital, where he is involved in research with the pain team. His area of interest is evaluating hospital pharmacy services to reduce patient harm and the need for hospital care.  He currently runs several randomised controlled trials and is the Principal Investigator for OpioidHALT II.

Read and watch the full series on our website or on YouTube.

Researchers from Rutgers Health and other institutions analyzed New York State Medicaid records for more than 141,000 patients receiving any psychiatric medication.  Nearly 400 of them received at least one potentially dangerous combination t for one month or longer. Doctors refer to these as severe drug-drug interactions, and their use is typically considered “contraindicated” or recommended against.

Senior study author Lawrence Kleinman, professor of pediatrics at Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, cautioned that while some children whose illness is resistant to usual treatments may receive more benefit than the risk from the combination, “Good practice demands that patients and caregivers be informed of and assent to risks and benefits, including informing them that the intended pair of medications is typically contraindicated.”

The study, published in BMC Primary Care, analyzed 2014 prescription data for New York Medicaid enrollees under 21. While the overall rate of these potentially dangerous combinations is small —about 3 in 1,000 children who filled any mental health medication prescription had at least one month of prescription overlap, and 5 per 1,000 had any overlap — these cases represent significant potential for harm or death. Kleinman noted that New York State Medicaid had previously implemented a program to reduce harmful drug interactions, suggesting numbers might be higher in other populations.

Polypharmacy (use of multiple medications) is very common, with nearly 38 percent of patients in the study filling two or more medications with at least one month overlap, generating more than 11,000 distinct drug combinations.

The study offered some reassurance: the most commonly filled mental health medications were stimulants typically used for conditions such as attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, and these were never combined with other drugs to create severe interaction risks. Most contraindicated combinations involved the antipsychotic drug ziprasidone, which can increase the risk of potentially fatal heart rhythm abnormalities such as QT interval prolongation or serotonin syndrome when paired with certain medications. Kleinman noted, “Because of this risk, the FDA has warned that ziprasidone should not be prescribed with other drugs that have demonstrated QT prolongations.”

About 32 percent (364) of the 1,121 patients prescribed ziprasidone also received a contraindicated partner medication for at least 30 days. It rose to 54 percent when considering prescription overlap of any duration.

Other common risky combinations involved antidepressants such as fluoxetine (Prozac) and trazodone paired with various antipsychotic medications, risking life-threatening QT interval prolongation and serotonin syndrome.

Researchers analyzed prescription claims data for all New York State Medicaid enrollees younger than 21 in 2014, identifying 84 distinct behavioral and mental health medications. They flagged combinations with severe interactions according to established drug interaction databases.

The team examined different durations for overlapping prescriptions: one day, 15 days, or 30 days. Even at the 30-day threshold, 392 young patients received contraindicated combinations, rising to 651 for any overlap.

Contraindicated combinations were more common in adolescents and young adults than younger children, with no children under 6 receiving risky combinations. While boys were more likely to receive any mental health medication, there was no gender difference in potentially dangerous pair usage.

Of over 20,000 clinicians prescribing psychiatric medications, 386 prescribed at least one contraindicated pair. Most were psychiatrists rather than pediatricians, which Kleinman suggested may be because psychiatrists likely see patients with more severe mental illness.

Kleinman added that insufficient research into treating mental illness in children  often left clinicians and families “flying blind.”

Among the study’s limitations was the age of its data. Prescribing patterns may have changed, especially post-COVID-19. Also, researchers couldn’t determine if patients took all medications as prescribed or if prescribers and parents made intentional, informed decisions about risky combinations.

Nevertheless, Kleinman emphasized the need for ongoing monitoring of prescription patterns to prevent potential harm. He suggested health systems and insurers implement systems to flag these rare but concerning cases for review.

“We believe that our data and this methodology could serve as the beginning of such efforts,” Kleinman said. “Ultimately, such ongoing monitoring could reduce harmful prescription combinations and medication-related adverse events.”

The case for reducing opioid treatment slowly before total hip and knee replacements is compelling, according to Dr Jonathan Penm. Many patients with osteoarthritis are taking opioids but “we know opioids are not the most effective medicine for osteoarthritis, so we’ve got a cohort of people taking a medicine that doesn’t have much evidence, that’s not very effective and comes with a lot of side effects”, he explains. Reducing the opioid doses is unlikely to make pain any worse but it could reduce the risk of harms, he adds. He notes that there is little evidence for the effectiveness of opioid dose tapering.  One previous retrospective study had shown that patients who tapered their opioids before surgery might have better post-surgical outcomes. However, as the study was not randomised it was not known if there was something different about the patients who tapered their doses. “They might just be patients who would naturally taper who weren’t as sick and so they have better outcomes – and so we just didn’t know if these harms were reversible”, he says.

OpioidHALT – objectives and methods

The objective of OpioidHALT study was to examine the feasibility and effectiveness of a pharmacist-led intervention to taper opioid dosage before hip and knee replacement surgery, compared with usual care.  The intervention was delivered via a video or telephone consultation. “Pharmacists and patients met ‘one-on-one’ over a Zoom meeting or over a telephone call and discussed their pain management and opioid use before surgery – approximately three months before their joint replacement surgery – with the aim to gradually taper their opioid dose until the day of their surgery”, explains Dr Shania Liu.

For this pilot study a single pharmacist based in the community conducted all the consultations. The pharmacist was trained using freely available, online resources. “We recently published a training package summarising these resources so any pharmacist can access them”, says Dr Liu. The pharmacist worked with each patient to  develop an opioid tapering plan that was evaluated for safety by a pain specialist. In addition, the GP was kept in the loop at all stages. Dr Liu emphasises the patient-centred nature of the consultations. “Patients could lead the level of opioid tapering that they wished. The opioid tapering rate, however, was guided by national guidelines on opioid tapering rates. So, this was, on average, 10 to 25% of the patient’s baseline opioid dose tapered per month – so quite gradual – and we did monitor for safety”, she says. Furthermore, patients were offered simple analgesics and non-pharmacological approaches to ensure that pain was managed whilst the opioid doses were being tapered.

About Dr Shania Liu and Dr Jonathan Penm

Dr Shania Liu  BPharm (Hons), GradCertEdStud (Higher Ed), PhD, FSHP, FHEA completed her PhD at the University of Sydney looking at a pharmacist-led opioid tapering program for patients undergoing total hip and knee arthroplasty. Currently, she is a post-doctoral research fellow working at the University of Alberta in Canada where she is leading two large randomised trials looking at pharmacist-partnered management of chronic conditions such as cardiovascular disease. She also  continues to be involved in the pharmacist-led opioid tapering work looking at the impacts of opioid tapering before hip and knee replacement surgery.

At the 2024 FIP Congress Dr Liu was awarded the International Pharmaceutical Federation Early Career in Pharmaceutical Practice Recognition Award. The purpose of the award is to recognise an outstanding early career pharmacist who has made important contributions to their field of practice at a national level, and who is emerging internationally.

Dr Jonathan Penm BPharm (Hons), GradCertEdStud (Higher Ed), PhD, FFIP, FSHP, FPS, FHEA, FANZCAP (PainMgmt, Research) is a senior lecturer at the University of Sydney School of Pharmacy in Australia. He is involved in both teaching and research and is also affiliated with the Prince of Wales Hospital, where he is involved in research with the pain team. His area of interest is evaluating hospital pharmacy services to reduce patient harm and the need for hospital care.  He currently runs several randomised controlled trials and is the Principal Investigator for OpioidHALT II.

Read and watch the full series on our website or on YouTube.

Patients who undergo total hip (THA) and total knee replacement surgery (TKA) suffer from end stage osteoarthritis with chronic pain. “We know from existing research that opioids are often no better than simple analgesics like paracetamol or acetaminophen or anti-inflammatory pain medicines for osteoarthritis-related pain – so these opioids are not providing any additional benefit and yet they carry the risk of additional side effects such as drowsiness and the risk of falls”, explains Dr Liu. Moreover, opioid use before surgery is linked to worse outcomes including slower recovery and persistent opioid use three months after surgery, she adds.

The OpioidHALT trial (Feasibility of responsible pre-operative opioid use for Hip and knee ArthropLasTy (OpioidHALT) pilot study) was designed to examine the feasibility and acceptability of an intervention to reduce opioid use before elective THA or TKA compared to usual practice. “Total hip and knee replacement surgeries are among the most common elective surgical procedures performed around the world with over 1 million of these procedures performed in the USA alone in 2021.  As we know, the population as a whole is aging so these procedures are expected to at least double in volume over the next decade”, explains Dr Liu

About Dr Shania Liu and Dr Jonathan Penm

Dr Shania Liu  BPharm (Hons), GradCertEdStud (Higher Ed), PhD, FSHP, FHEA completed her PhD at the University of Sydney looking at a pharmacist-led opioid tapering program for patients undergoing total hip and knee arthroplasty. Currently, she is a post-doctoral research fellow working at the University of Alberta in Canada where she is leading two large randomised trials looking at pharmacist-partnered management of chronic conditions such as cardiovascular disease. She also  continues to be involved in the pharmacist-led opioid tapering work looking at the impacts of opioid tapering before hip and knee replacement surgery.

At the 2024 FIP Congress Dr Liu was awarded the International Pharmaceutical Federation Early Career in Pharmaceutical Practice Recognition Award. The purpose of the award is to recognise an outstanding early career pharmacist who has made important contributions to their field of practice at a national level, and who is emerging internationally.

Dr Jonathan Penm BPharm (Hons), GradCertEdStud (Higher Ed), PhD, FFIP, FSHP, FPS, FHEA, FANZCAP (PainMgmt, Research) is a senior lecturer at the University of Sydney School of Pharmacy in Australia. He is involved in both teaching and research and is also affiliated with the Prince of Wales Hospital, where he is involved in research with the pain team. His area of interest is evaluating hospital pharmacy services to reduce patient harm and the need for hospital care.  He currently runs several randomised controlled trials and is the Principal Investigator for OpioidHALT II.

Read and watch the full series on our website or on YouTube.

“As pharmacies close, more and more Americans are left without easy access to medications, with disproportionate consequences on certain communities. We found that patients in counties with higher social vulnerabilities and fewer primary care providers were up to 40% more likely to reside in a region with a pharmacy desert,” said Timothy Pawlik, MD, senior author of the study and holder of the Urban Meyer III and Shelley Meyer Chair for Cancer Research at the OSUCCC – James. Pawlik also serves as surgeon-in-chief at The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and as chair of the Department of Surgery in the Ohio State College of Medicine.

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) defines social vulnerability as “potential negative effects on communities caused by external stresses on human health.”

“These findings highlight how disparities compound the lack of access to basic health care and how it can lead to many people not taking their prescribed medications and having worse health outcomes, especially for chronic conditions like diabetes and hypertension,” Pawlik added.

Study results were published today in JAMA Network Open.

Methods and Results
Researchers reviewed data on communities located less than 10 miles from the nearest retail pharmacy from the publicly available TelePharm Map. Counties were noted as having a high pharmacy desert density if the number of pharmacy deserts per 1,000 residents was in the 75th percentile. Social vulnerability index (SVI) and healthcare provider data were obtained from the CDC’s Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry and the Area Health Resource File databases, respectively. The researchers used statistical methods to analyze the relationships between these factors.

The study found almost 46% of the 3,143 counties had at least one pharmacy desert. Counties with a high density of pharmacy deserts had higher social vulnerability and fewer primary care providers. People in these high-density pharmacy desert areas were more likely to face difficulties accessing medications and healthcare services.

Collaborators in this study include Giovanni Catalano, MD, Muhammad Muntazir Mehdi Khan, MBBS, and Odysseas P. Chatzipanagiotou, MD.

Why community pharmacists need skills in differential diagnosis

By 2026 all pharmacy graduates will have an independent prescribing qualification and there will be a increasing emphasis on clinical activities in community pharmacy.  Professor Rutter’s new book uses a case-study format and emphasises the importance of clinical reasoning to reach a diagnosis.

The WWHAM mnemonic is no longer adequate to guide consultations, he explains.

WWHAM stands for:

• Who: Who is the medicine for?
• What: What are the symptoms?
• How long: How long have the symptoms been present?
• Action: What action has been taken?
• Medication: Are you taking any other medication?

How clinical reasoning underpins effective consultations

Professor Rutter’s new book follows a case study format because this is an effective way to “contextualise facts and figures and knowledge into something more ‘real life’”, he says. For example, a symptom such as cough would be approached very differently in a 75-year-old man from a 5-year-old child. The objective of the consultation is to sift out from the list of possible causes of cough those that are most likely in the patient in question. Clinical reasoning is flexible and responsive and allows the practitioner to take a long list of conditions and narrow it down into a smaller number of possibilities in a logical way.

Clinical reasoning – the challenge of moving from novice to expert

The Pharmacy First scheme allows the pharmacist access to medicines which otherwise would be prescription only medicines (POMs), in specific situations. Clinical reasoning is important in establishing a diagnosis which is the first step in the Pharmacy First service.  Professor Rutter envisages that the Pharmacy First service will be extended in future as part of the movement to make pharmacy a more clinical profession. This will call for more expertise in clinical reasoning and feedback on pharmacists’ performance will be essential to raise their “ceiling of competence”, he explains.

In future, community pharmacists’ clinical role will be extended further and the traditional dispensing role will diminish. In addition, “I think the digital side of pharmacy will increase and that will hopefully allow greater communication between pharmacy and general practice services so they’re better integrated”, he says.

About Paul Rutter

Paul Rutter is  Professor of Pharmacy Practice at Portsmouth University. His main area of interest is differential diagnosis of minor conditions for pharmacists and his academic teaching deals mainly with this topic. He is the author of the textbook, Symptoms, Diagnosis and Treatment in Community Pharmacy, now in its fifth edition. His new book, Differential diagnosis for non-medical prescribers, nurses and pharmacists: A case-based approach, was published in August 2024.

Read and watch the full series on our website or on YouTube.